新時代が来た

なにをしにきたかわからないG８はたぶん、陰では銀行の救済のことを言ってるんでしょう。

環境なんかなんの関係もない。戦争やめさせるのが一番の環境対策だから、アメ公の戦争やの大将がきてるのだからうまくいくわけない、ヨーロッパは１９世紀からえんえんとしているアフリカしゃぶりをやめなさい。

環境問題を解決したいなら、「G８以外」会議をすりゃいい。

引用開始
拡大会合に出席した国連（UN）の潘基文（パン・キムン、Ban Ki-moon）事務総長もアフリカ首脳に対する支持を表明し、G8首脳に2010年までに対アフリカ支援を倍増させるとした過去のサミットでの公約を履行するよう求めた。

　国連は、2015年までにアフリカでの貧困を減らし、健康・衛生状態や教育を発展させることなどを盛り込んだミレニアム開発目標（Millennium Development Goals）を2000年に採択しているが、G8諸国は目標を達成できておらず、原油・食糧価格の高騰などを背景に問題はさらに悪化している。

　欧州委員会（European Commission）のジョゼ・マヌエル・バローゾ（Jose Manuel Barroso）委員長は同日、貧困国の飢餓対策および農業支援を目的として、10億ユーロ（約1700億円）の基金を設立する考えを表明している。

終わり＞

だれがそのかねだすねん？

ようするに、G８（ニホン以外）が自分たちが食い散らかしているアフリカを助ける金をニホンに資源アクセスをえさにかねださせたろという思惑、アフリカは物乞いにきた、わけだ。

で政治資金がない自民党はODAのキャッシュバックねたができて喜んでるのかな？

環境問題なんか、な〜んにもかんけいありまへん。

このへんな国連総長はなにをしたいのかさっぱりわかりまへん。

このさい環境グッズを売ってやろうという経団連の銭ゲバ連中もなんとなく足もとみられて商談失敗かな？

理念が「金がすべて」でユダ公が何かできる時代は今回の神様の計らい（国際金融危機）で永久に去ってしまってます、よね？

参考資料：ベンさんより。さすがに記事掘り出しはプロだ。
＜引用開始＞
世界銀行の中で真面目に働く人間が作ったこの「食料難の原因データSecret report: biofuel caused food crisiｓ」はＴｏｐが秘密にしようとしたが、内部告発者によってイギリスのガーディアン誌に漏らされた。
＜引用終わり＞
もとねたはここ
＜引用開始＞

Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis

Internal World Bank study delivers blow to plant energy drive

Biofuels have forced global food prices up by 75% - far more than previously estimated - according to a confidential World Bank report obtained by the Guardian.

The damning unpublished assessment is based on the most detailed analysis of the crisis so far, carried out by an internationally-respected economist at global financial body.

The figure emphatically contradicts the US government's claims that plant-derived fuels contribute less than 3% to food-price rises. It will add to pressure on governments in Washington and across Europe, which have turned to plant-derived fuels to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and reduce their dependence on imported oil.

Senior development sources believe the report, completed in April, has not been published to avoid embarrassing President George Bush.

"It would put the World Bank in a political hot-spot with the White House," said one yesterday.

The news comes at a critical point in the world's negotiations on biofuels policy. Leaders of the G8 industrialised countries meet next week in Hokkaido, Japan, where they will discuss the food crisis and come under intense lobbying from campaigners calling for a moratorium on the use of plant-derived fuels.

It will also put pressure on the British government, which is due to release its own report on the impact of biofuels, the Gallagher Report. The Guardian has previously reported that the British study will state that plant fuels have played a "significant" part in pushing up food prices to record levels. Although it was expected last week, the report has still not been released.

"Political leaders seem intent on suppressing and ignoring the strong evidence that biofuels are a major factor in recent food price rises," said Robert Bailey, policy adviser at Oxfam. "It is imperative that we have the full picture. While politicians concentrate on keeping industry lobbies happy, people in poor countries cannot afford enough to eat."

Rising food prices have pushed 100m people worldwide below the poverty line, estimates the World Bank, and have sparked riots from Bangladesh to Egypt. Government ministers here have described higher food and fuel prices as "the first real economic crisis of globalisation".

President Bush has linked higher food prices to higher demand from India and China, but the leaked World Bank study disputes that: "Rapid income growth in developing countries has not led to large increases in global grain consumption and was not a major factor responsible for the large price increases."

Even successive droughts in Australia, calculates the report, have had a marginal impact. Instead, it argues that the EU and US drive for biofuels has had by far the biggest impact on food supply and prices.

Since April, all petrol and diesel in Britain has had to include 2.5% from biofuels. The EU has been considering raising that target to 10% by 2020, but is faced with mounting evidence that that will only push food prices higher.

"Without the increase in biofuels, global wheat and maize stocks would not have declined appreciably and price increases due to other factors would have been moderate," says the report. The basket of food prices examined in the study rose by 140% between 2002 and this February. The report estimates that higher energy and fertiliser prices accounted for an increase of only 15%, while biofuels have been responsible for a 75% jump over that period.

It argues that production of biofuels has distorted food markets in three main ways. First, it has diverted grain away from food for fuel, with over a third of US corn now used to produce ethanol and about half of vegetable oils in the EU going towards the production of biodiesel. Second, farmers have been encouraged to set land aside for biofuel production. Third, it has sparked financial speculation in grains, driving prices up higher.

Other reviews of the food crisis looked at it over a much longer period, or have not linked these three factors, and so arrived at smaller estimates of the impact from biofuels. But the report author, Don Mitchell, is a senior economist at the Bank and has done a detailed, month-by-month analysis of the surge in food prices, which allows much closer examination of the link between biofuels and food supply.

The report points out biofuels derived from sugarcane, which Brazil specializes in, have not had such a dramatic impact.

Supporters of biofuels argue that they are a greener alternative to relying on oil and other fossil fuels, but even that claim has been disputed by some experts, who argue that it does not apply to US production of ethanol from plants.

"It is clear that some biofuels have huge impacts on food prices," said Dr David King, the government's former chief scientific adviser, last night. "All we are doing by supporting these is subsidising higher food prices, while doing nothing to tackle climate change."
＜引用終わり＞

「食い物燃やしたら、食料上がるわ、もっと儲かるわ、エテ公（非白人）餓死するわ、世界不安になるわ、戦争起こるわ、俺うれしいわ」、がネオナチ（ブッシュ）の意見らしい。それをはっきりはいえんので「口もごもご」

ええかっこし〜のＥＵは「いくらなんでもやりすぎちゃうか」、と思っているが、非白人からいんちき炭素ー環境税をふんだくって儲けもしたいし、アフリカの難儀をニホンに押し付けたいので、はっきりいえずに「口もごもご」。

それで、「資源がほしいが、難儀はゴメン、しかし、ＯＤＡのバックマージンほしい」のニホンの自民党はこれも「口もごもご」。

なにがどうでも、ニホンの環境製品が売れりゃいいわ、と思っているが、アフリカの難儀を押し付けられたらいくらかねあっても足りんので、商売人の連中も「口もごもご」

洞爺湖サミットの「さっぱりわからない理由」がやっとわかった気がしてきたぞ。そこでいつものojisan狂句をひとつ、

「洞爺湖は、もごもごもごと、意味不明」。、

チョッとパンチたらんな。。。。。。